Stroop Effect Tests & Experiments
Stroop Effect Background Information
Demonstration
Say aloud the colors of these each of these words, as fast as you can:
Green Red Blue
Yellow Blue Yellow
Blue Yellow Red
Green Yellow Green
If naming the first group of colors is easier and quicker than the second, then your performance exhibits the Stroop effect.
In psychology, the Stroop effect is a demonstration of interference in the reaction time of a task. When a word such as blue, green, red, etc. is printed in a color differing from the color expressed by the word's semantic
meaning (e.g. the word "red" printed in blue ink), a delay occurs in
the processing of the word's color, leading to slower test reaction
times and an increase in mistakes. The effect is named after John Ridley Stroop who first published the effect in English in 1935[1]. The effect had previously been published by Jaensch in 1929[2][3], but only in German. The original paper has been one of the most cited papers in the history of experimental psychology, leading to over 700 replications.[4]
Original experiment
In his experiment, J. Ridley Stroop administered several variations of two main tests. Stroop referred to his tests as RCN,
to stand for "Reading Color Names", where participants were required to
repeat the written meaning of words with differing colored fonts, and NCW,
to stand for "Naming Colored Words", in which participants were asked
to verbally identify the color of each printed color name. Additionally
Stroop tested his participants at different stages of practice with
each task, to account for the effects of association.
Stroop identified a large increase on the time taken by participants
to complete the NCW (Naming Colored Words) tasks, an effect still
pronounced despite continued practice at each task. This interference
is thought to have been caused by the automation of reading, where the mind automatically determines the semantic
meaning of the word, and then must override this first impression with
the identification of the color of the word, a process which is not
automatized.
Further development
Edith Kaplan's group (developer of the Delis-Kaplan neuropsychological test
battery) developed the task further by separating the task into four
stages: naming color fields, congruent color words, incongruent color
words, and combined. The additional strain on the executive function of the brain allows for a more precise diagnosis.
The Stroop task (effect) is also employed to study frontal function and attention
in brain imaging studies. Speaking is not possible in the scanner
because it moves the head, so a number theme is often used instead. For
instance, three words may be displayed that read "two" and the participant must press three
on their button box. Another variant is to present emotional pictures
in the scanner (again using the number paradigm) to determine their
effect on frontal inhibition. The use of pictures in general and
particularly in studying post-traumatic stress disorder has been controversial, especially regarding bias effects in stimulus creation.
Since its development, the Stroop task, a measure of the
effect of interference on performance of a color identification task,
has utilized the Stroop effect to investigate aspects of such varied
psychological disorders as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Anorexia. EEG and fMRI studies of the Stroop effect have revealed selective activation of the anterior cingulate cortex during a stroop task, a prefrontal structure (see frontal lobe)
in the brain which is hypothesized to be responsible for conflict
monitoring. J. Ridley Stroop's original word color identification test
has additionally been modified to include other sensory modalities and variables.
In synesthetes
A similar effect has been observed in individuals with grapheme-color synesthesia
- people who perceive colors when seeing certain numbers and letters.
If a number or letter is presented to such an individual in a color
other than what they would perceive, there is a delay in determining
what color the character actually is. According to V.S. Ramachandran and Edward M. Hubbard:
| “ |
If the number has a
different color than the one the synesthesia evokes--a green 5, instead
of the synesthetic red, for example--it takes slightly longer for the
synesthete to name the color. The induced color delays the ability to
report the real color. This effect, called Stroop interference, shows
that the color associations are automatic.[5] |
” |
Emotional Stroop Test
In psychology, the Emotional Stroop Test is used as an information-processing approach to assessing emotions. Related to the standard Stroop effect,
the emotional Stroop test works by examining the response time of the
participant to name colors of negative emotional words. For example,
depressed participants will be slower to say the color of depressing
words rather than non-depressing words. Non-clinical subjects have also
been shown to name the color of an emotional word (e.g., "war",
"cancer", "kill") slower than naming the color of a neutral word (e.g.,
"clock", "lift", "windy") (Gotlib & McCann, 1984).
While the emotional Stroop test and the classic Stroop effect elicit
similar behavioral outcomes (a slowing in response times to colored
words), these tests engage different mechanisms of interference
(McKenna & Sharma, 2004). The classic Stroop test creates a
conflict between an incongruent color and word (the word ‘RED’ in font
color blue) but the emotional Stroop involves only emotional and
neutral words -- color does not affect slowing because it does not
conflict with word meaning. In other words, studies show the same
effects of slowing for emotional words relative to neutral even if all
the words are black. Thus, the emotional Stroop does not involve an
effect of conflict between a word meaning and a color of text, but
rather appears to capture attention and slow response time due to the
emotional relevance of the word for the individual. The emotional
Stroop test has been used broadly in clinical studies using emotional
words related to a particular individual's area of concern, such as
alcohol-related words for someone who is alcoholic, or words involving
a particular phobia for someone with anxiety
or phobic disorders. Both the classic and the emotional Stroop tests,
however, involve the need to suppress responses to distracting word
information, while selectively maintaining attention on the color of
the word to complete the task. (Compton et al, 2003).
References
- Algom, D., Chajut, E. & Lev, S. (2005). A rational look at the
emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134:585-91.
- Compton, R.J., Banich, M.T., Mohanty, A., Milham, M.P., Herrington,
J., Miller, G.A., Scalf, P.E., Webb, A. & Heller, W. (2003). Paying
attention to emotion: an fMRI investigation of cognitive and emotional
stroop tasks. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3:81-96.
- Gotlib, I.H., & McCann, C.D. (1984). Construct accessibility
and depression: An examination of cognitive and affective factorss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 427-439.
- McKenna, F.P. & Sharma, D. (2004). Reversing the emotional
Stroop effect reveals that it is not what it seems: the role of fast
and slow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30, 382-92.
Stroop effect in popular culture
The Brain Age: Train Your Brain in Minutes a Day! software program, produced by Ryūta Kawashima for the Nintendo DS portable video game system, contains an automated Stroop Test administrator module, translated into game form.
A Nova
episode used the Stroop Effect to illustrate the subtle changes of the
mental flexibility of Mt. Everest climbers in relation to altitude. [1]
A Perplex City card (#043) entitled "Use your Anterior Cingulate" asks who discovered this phenomenon.
References
- ^ Stroop, John Ridley (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions Journal of Experimental Psychology
- ^ Jaensch, E. R. (1929). Grundformen menschlichen Seins. Berlin: Otto Elsner.
- ^ Jensen, A. R., & Rohwer, W D., Jr. (1966). The Stroop color-word test: A review. Acta Psychologica, 25, 36-93
- ^ MacLeod, C.M. (1991). Half a Century of Research on the Stroop Effect: An Integrative Review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2):163-203.
- ^ Ramachandran, V.S. and Edward M. Hubbard. "More Common Questions about Synesthesia. Scientific American online. April 14, 2003. URL accessed 2007-03-12.
External links
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Stroop Effect"
|