Butanol Fuel
Butanol may be used as a fuel in an internal combustion engine. Because its longer hydrocarbon chain causes it to be fairly non-polar, it is more similar to gasoline than is ethanol. Butanol has been demonstrated to work in some vehicles designed for use with gasoline without any modification.[1] It can be produced from biomass (as "biobutanol") as well as fossil fuels (as "petrobutanol"); both biobutanol and petrobutanol have the same chemical properties.
Production of butanol from biomass
-
Main article: Energy crop
Butanol from biomass is called biobutanol. It can be produced by fermentation of biomass by the A.B.E. process. The process uses the bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum, also known as the Weizmann organism. It was Chaim Weizmann who first used this bacteria for the production of acetone from starch (with the main use of acetone being the making of Cordite) in 1916.
The butanol was a by-product of this fermentation (twice as much
butanol was produced). The process also creates a recoverable amount of
H2 and a number of other by-products: acetic, lactic and propionic acids, acetone, isopropanol and ethanol.
The difference from ethanol production is primarily in the fermentation of the feedstock and minor changes in distillation. The feedstocks are the same as for ethanol: energy crops such as sugar beets, sugar cane, corn grain, wheat and cassava as well as agricultural byproducts such as straw and corn stalks (reference needed). According to DuPont, existing bioethanol plants can cost-effectively be retrofitted to biobutanol production.[2]
Algae butanol
-
Main articles: Algae fuel
Biobutanol can be made entirely with solar energy, from algae (called Solalgal Fuel) or diatoms.[3]
Centia process
Centia is based on a three-step thermal, catalytic, and reforming
process that has the potential to turn virtually any lipidic
compound—e.g., vegetable oils, oils from animal fat and oils from
algae—into 1-for-1 replacements for petroleum jet fuel, diesel, and
gasoline. The three steps are:[4]
Distribution
Butanol better tolerates water contamination and is less corrosive
than ethanol and more suitable for distribution through existing pipelines for gasoline.[2] In blends with diesel or gasoline, butanol is less likely to separate from this fuel than ethanol if the fuel is contaminated with water.[2] There is also a vapor pressure
co-blend synergy with butanol and gasoline containing ethanol, which
facilitates ethanol blending. This facilitates storage and distribution
of blended fuels.[2][5][6]
Properties of common fuels
Energy content and effects on fuel economy
Switching a gasoline engine over to butanol would in theory result in a fuel consumption penalty of about 10%[7]
but butanol's effect on mileage is yet to be determined by a scientific
study. While the energy density for any mixture of gasoline and butanol
can be calculated, tests with other alcohol fuels have demonstrated
that the effect on fuel economy is not proportional to the change in
energy density.[8]
Octane rating
The octane rating of n-butanol is similar to that of gasoline but lower than that of ethanol and methanol. n-Butanol has a RON (Research Octane number) of 96 and a MON (Motor octane number) of 78 while t-butanol has octane ratings of 105 RON and 89 MON.[9] t-Butanol
is used as an additive in gasoline but cannot be used as a fuel in its
pure form because its relatively high melting point of 25.5 °C causes
it to gel and freeze near room temperature.
A fuel with a higher octane rating is less prone to knocking
(extremely rapid and spontaneous combustion by compression) and the
control system of any modern car engine can take advantage of this by
adjusting the ignition timing. This will improve energy efficiency,
leading to a better fuel economy than the comparisons of energy content
different fuels indicate. By increasing the compression ratio, further
gains in fuel economy, power and torque can be achieved. Conversely, a
fuel with lower octane rating is more prone to knocking and will lower
efficiency. Knocking can also cause engine damage.[10]
Air-fuel ratio
Alcohol fuels, including butanol and ethanol, are partially oxidized
and therefore need to run at richer mixtures than gasoline. Standard
gasoline engines in cars can adjust the air-fuel ratio to accommodate
variations in the fuel, but only within certain limits depending on
model. If the limit is exceeded by running the engine on pure butanol
or a gasoline blend with a high percentage of butanol, the engine will
run lean, something which can damage it. Compared to ethanol, butanol
can be mixed in higher ratios with gasoline for use in existing cars
without the need for retrofit as the air-fuel ratio and energy content
are closer to that of gasoline.[5][6]
Specific energy
Alcohol fuels have less energy per unit weight and unit volume than
gasoline. To make it possible to compare the net energy released per
cycle a measure called the fuels specific energy is sometimes used. It
is defined as the energy released per air fuel ratio. The net energy
released per cycle is higher for butanol than ethanol or methanol and
about 10% higher than for gasoline.
Viscosity
| Substance |
Kinematic
viscosity
at 20°C |
| Butanol |
3.64 cSt |
| Ethanol |
1.52 cSt |
| Methanol |
0.64 cSt |
| Gasoline |
0.4–0.8 cSt |
| Diesel |
>3 cSt |
| Water |
1.0 cSt |
The viscosity of alcohols increase with longer carbon chains. For
this reason, butanol is used as an alternative to shorter alcohols when
a more viscous solvent is desired. The kinematic viscosity of butanol
is several times higher than that of gasoline and about as viscous as
high quality diesel fuel.[11]
Heat of vaporization
The fuel in an engine has to be vaporized before it will burn.
Insufficient vaporization is a known problem with alcohol fuels during
cold starts in cold weather. As the latent heat of vaporization of
butanol is less than half of that of ethanol, an engine running on
butanol should be easier to start in cold weather than one running on
ethanol or methanol.[5]
Potential problems with the use of butanol fuel
The potential problems with the use of butanol are similar to those of ethanol:
- To match the combustion characteristics of gasoline, the
utilization of butanol fuel as a substitute for gasoline requires
fuel-flow increases (though butanol has only slightly less energy than
gasoline, so the fuel-flow increase required is only minimal, maybe
10%, compared to 40% for ethanol.)
- Alcohol-based fuels are not compatible with some fuel system components.
- Alcohol fuels may cause erroneous gas gauge readings in vehicles with capacitance fuel level gauging.
- While ethanol and methanol have lower energy densities than
butanol, their higher octane number allows for greater compression
ratio and efficiency. Higher combustion engine efficiency allows for
lesser greenhouse gas emissions per unit motive energy extracted.
As an advantage, butanol production from biomass could be more
efficient (i.e. unit engine motive power delivered per unit solar
energy consumed) than ethanol or methanol routes. Also, some bacteria
that produce butanol are able to digest cellulose, not just starch and
sugars.
Possible butanol fuel mixtures
Standards for the blending of ethanol and methanol in gasoline exist
in many countries, including the EU, the US and Brazil. Approximate
equivalent butanol blends can be calculated from the relations between
the stochiometric fuel-air ratio of butanol, ethanol and gasoline. Common ethanol fuel mixtures
for fuel sold as gasoline currently range from 5% to 10%. The share of
butanol can be 60% greater than the equivalent ethanol share, which
gives a range from 8% to 32%. "Equivalent" in this case refers only to
the vehicle's ability to adjust to the fuel. Other properties such as
energy density, viscosity and heat of vaporisation will vary and may
further limit the percentage of butanol that can be blended with
gasoline.
Current use of butanol in vehicles
Currently no production vehicle is known to be approved by the
manufacturer for use with 100% butanol, though any model that is able
to run 10% ethanol blends should be able to use butanol without any
problems.[original research?]
David Ramey drove from Blacklick, Ohio to San Diego, California using butanol in an unmodified 1992 Buick Park Avenue.[1][12]
Although further long term testing must be done, it is highly likely
that most late model cars can run on 100% butanol safely with no
modifications. Justification for this conclusion is based on data for
RON in comparison of n-Butanol with Gasoline. Also, modern ECU-injected
motorcar piston engines are designed to be flexible enough to deliver
good performance with 91-RON fuels, which n-Butanol exceeds in RON
rating.
Research challenges
The key research challenge that must be resolved is that butanol
production inhibits microbial growth even at low concentrations. The
result is that the product of the fermentation is less than 2% butanol.
The overwhelming majority of the fermentation broth is water, so an
energy-intensive distillation step is required for purification. This
may be acceptable if the goal is to produce butanol for use as a
solvent, but if butanol is to gain traction as a motor fuel, energy
inputs into the process need to be minimized.[13]
The Swiss company Butalco GmbH uses a special technology to modify
yeasts in order to produce butanol instead of ethanol. Yeasts as
production organisms for butanol have decisive advantages compared to
bacteria.[14]
External links
Notes
References
- Continuous two-stage ABE-fermentation using Clostridium beijerinckii NRLL
B592 operating with a growth rate in the first stage vessel close to
its maximal value, J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000 Jan;2(1):101-5.
- As Gas Prices Climb, Butanol Research Reaches Exciting Stage
- The Economics of Acetone-Butanol Fermentation: Theoretical and
Market Considerations, J.R. Gapes, J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000
Jan;2(1):27-32.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia Encyclopedia article "Butanol Fuel"
|